I liked this essay by John Gilmore. When asked what's wrong with access control technology (aka copy protection) if consumers don't seem to mind, John's answers included:
What is wrong is when people who would like products that simply record bits, or audio, or video, without any copy protection, can't find any, because they have been driven off the market.
What is wrong is when companies who make copy-protecting products don't disclose the restrictions to the consumers.
What is wrong is when scientific researchers are unable to study the field or to publish their findings.
What is wrong is when competitors are unable to build competing devices or software, vying for the favor of the consumers in the free market. [Because of the threat of harassing lawsuits from corporate content owners]
What is wrong is when the controls that are enacted to protect the rights reserved under copyright are used for other purposes.
What is wrong is when social policy is created in back rooms, between movie/record company executives and computer company executives, not by open public discussion, by legislatures, and by courts.
What is wrong is when the balance between the rights of creators and the rights of freedom of speech and the press is lost.
What is wrong is that a tiny tail of "copyright protection" is wagging the dog of all communications among humans.
What is wrong is that we have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity [digital encoding on computers], but we are deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from scarcity.
A full copy appears below:
Read More …